王珂凡, 王伟, 张倩. 产业链治理制度创新如何提升企业劳动生产率——来自产业链“链长制”的证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (5): 70-80.
引用本文: 王珂凡, 王伟, 张倩. 产业链治理制度创新如何提升企业劳动生产率——来自产业链“链长制”的证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (5): 70-80.
Wang Kefan, Wang Wei, Zhang Qian. How Industrial Chain Governance Institutional Innovation Enhances Corporate Labor Productivity: Evidence from the "Chain Chief" SystemJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (5): 70-80.
Citation: Wang Kefan, Wang Wei, Zhang Qian. How Industrial Chain Governance Institutional Innovation Enhances Corporate Labor Productivity: Evidence from the "Chain Chief" SystemJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (5): 70-80.

产业链治理制度创新如何提升企业劳动生产率——来自产业链“链长制”的证据

How Industrial Chain Governance Institutional Innovation Enhances Corporate Labor Productivity: Evidence from the "Chain Chief" System

  • 摘要: 由地方党政负责人担任“链长”、行业龙头企业担任“链主”的“链长制”,是我国行政协调与市场机制相结合的产业链治理制度创新。本文以沪深A股上市公司为样本,采用多期双重差分模型,研究发现“链长制”实施显著提升了企业劳动生产率,尤其对内控质量较低、技术密集型和市场集中度低行业、财政支持力度较大地区的企业作用更明显。作用机制在于:(1)降低企业管理成本。通过增强上下游企业间的信息共享与协同配合,减少由供需变化、要素约束等造成的库存积压和资源错配,减少沟通、协调和履约环节的成本,从流程规范、数字化管理等方面提高执行效率。(2)提高单位劳动投入的产出水平。通过明确产业发展方向、释放技术需求和增加产业项目,推动创新型人力资源向企业流动和集聚,提升企业对外部知识的识别、筛选、吸收与再开发能力,使其更快转化为工艺改进、设备优化和生产流程升级。(3)减少技术试错和生产磨合中的无效劳动投入。通过强化技术供需对接、搭建协同创新平台和完善合作保障机制,推动企业与高校、科研机构之间形成稳定深入的产学研合作关系,促进新技术、新工艺更快嵌入生产环节。经济后果检验表明,“链长制”通过提高企业劳动生产率,进一步提升了企业市场价值和新质生产力发展水平。本文为优化地方产业政策体系、提升企业生产效率提供了有益启示。

     

    Abstract: The "Chain Chief" system, whereby local Party and government leaders serve as "chain chiefs" and leading industry enterprises serve as "chain anchors", represents an institutional innovation in industrial chain governance that integrates administrative coordination with market mechanisms in China. Using listed companies on Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets as samples and employing a multi-period difference-in-differences model, this study finds that implementation of the "Chain Chief" system significantly enhances corporate labor productivity, with effects being particularly pronounced for enterprises with lower internal control quality, those in technology-intensive and less concentrated industries, and those in regions with greater fiscal support. The mechanisms operate through: (1) Reducing corporate management costs. By strengthening information sharing and collaborative coordination between upstream and downstream enterprises, the system reduces inventory accumulation and resource misallocation caused by supply-demand fluctuations and factor constraints, decreases costs in communication, coordination, and contract fulfillment, and improves execution efficiency through process standardization and digital management. (2) Increasing output per unit of labor input. By clarifying industrial development directions, releasing technological demands, and expanding industrial projects, the system promotes the flow and agglomeration of innovative human resources to enterprises, enhances corporate capacity for identifying, screening, absorbing, and redeveloping external knowledge, enabling faster conversion into process improvements, equipment optimization, and production process upgrades. (3) Reducing ineffective labor input in technological trial-and-error and production adjustment processes. By strengthening technology supply-demand matching, establishing collaborative innovation platforms, and improving cooperation guarantee mechanisms, the system promotes stable and deep industry-university-research partnerships between enterprises, universities, and research institutions, facilitating faster integration of new technologies and processes into production operations. Economic consequence analysis demonstrates that the "Chain Chief" system, through enhancing corporate labor productivity, further elevates corporate market value and new quality productive forces development levels. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing local industrial policy systems and improving corporate production efficiency.

     

/

返回文章
返回