胡改蓉, 肖铮. 我国控制股东私利并购行为的体系化规制J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (3): 14-26.
引用本文: 胡改蓉, 肖铮. 我国控制股东私利并购行为的体系化规制J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (3): 14-26.
Hu Gairong, Xiao Zheng. Systematic Regulation of Self-Interested Merger and Acquisition Conduct by Controlling Shareholders in ChinaJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (3): 14-26.
Citation: Hu Gairong, Xiao Zheng. Systematic Regulation of Self-Interested Merger and Acquisition Conduct by Controlling Shareholders in ChinaJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (3): 14-26.

我国控制股东私利并购行为的体系化规制

Systematic Regulation of Self-Interested Merger and Acquisition Conduct by Controlling Shareholders in China

  • 摘要: 公司并购在完善公司治理与优化资源配置等方面具有重要作用,但控制股东也可能通过关联并购、事实合并、挤出式并购等行为谋取私利,损害少数股东及公司利益。我国现行法律在规制此类行为仍存在制度供给不足:在行为规制层面,针对事实合并、挤出式并购等特殊并购类型的规范有待完善,股东回购请求权的适用范围受限;在程序控制层面,表决权回避规则设置尚不够周延,信息披露机制偏重于形式;在司法治理层面,关联交易的公平性审查尚未完全厘清程序公平与实质公平的关系,股权回购价格的司法认定标准较为单一。上述制度之间的协同不足导致控制权行使的边界较为模糊,亦在一定程度上制约了公司自治与司法治理功能的充分发挥。究其原因,主要在于现有规则对公司并购中控制股东与公司间利益冲突的特殊性回应不足,禁止权利滥用原则在适用中需要进一步具体化。对此,建议基于控制股东私利并购的利益冲突属性,通过明确控制股东义务、优化公司自治规则、补足司法裁判短板,构建更为完备的规制体系,从而有效实现制度的功能预期,提升公司并购的资源整合效益。

     

    Abstract: Corporate mergers and acquisitions (M&A) play a vital role in improving corporate governance and optimizing resource allocation. However, controlling shareholders may exploit related-party M&A, de facto mergers, squeeze-out mergers, and similar transactions to pursue private benefits at the expense of minority shareholders and corporate interests. China's current legal framework exhibits insufficient institutional supply in regulating such conduct. At the behavioral regulation level, rules governing special M&A types such as de facto mergers and squeeze-out mergers require refinement, and the scope of shareholders' appraisal rights remains limited. At the procedural control level, voting recusal rules lack comprehensiveness, and information disclosure mechanisms overemphasize formality. At the judicial governance level, fairness reviews of related-party transactions have not fully clarified the relationship between procedural and substantive fairness, and judicial standards for determining share repurchase prices remain overly singular. Inadequate coordination among these institutional mechanisms obscures the boundaries of control rights exercise and, to some extent, constrains the full realization of corporate autonomy and judicial governance functions. The underlying causes primarily stem from existing rules' insufficient responsiveness to the distinctive nature of interest conflicts between controlling shareholders and companies in M&A contexts, and the need for further specification of the principle prohibiting abuse of rights in application. Accordingly, this study recommends constructing a more comprehensive regulatory system based on the conflict-of-interest attributes of controlling shareholders' self-interested M&A by clarifying controlling shareholder duties, optimizing corporate autonomy rules, and remedying judicial adjudication deficiencies. Such systematic regulation would effectively fulfill institutional functional expectations and enhance the resource integration benefits of corporate M&A.

     

/

返回文章
返回