姜英兵, 赵支雪, 张伟杰. 信用评级下调、商业信用运用与企业供应链效率[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (2): 16-28, 67.
引用本文: 姜英兵, 赵支雪, 张伟杰. 信用评级下调、商业信用运用与企业供应链效率[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (2): 16-28, 67.
Jiang Yingbing, Zhao Zhixue, Zhang Weijie. Credit Rating Downgrade, Trade Credit Application, and Corporate Supply Chain Efficiency[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (2): 16-28, 67.
Citation: Jiang Yingbing, Zhao Zhixue, Zhang Weijie. Credit Rating Downgrade, Trade Credit Application, and Corporate Supply Chain Efficiency[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (2): 16-28, 67.

信用评级下调、商业信用运用与企业供应链效率

Credit Rating Downgrade, Trade Credit Application, and Corporate Supply Chain Efficiency

  • 摘要: 信用评级下调可能加剧企业信贷融资约束,企业如何利用商业信用应对流动性冲击、保障供应链稳定运行值得研究。本文以具有主体信用评级的沪深A股上市公司为样本,研究发现信用评级下调企业往往以应付账款形式获得上游商业信用融资,且在考虑反向因果、遗漏变量和样本选择偏差等问题后依然成立。分析表明,具有信用评级的公司往往处于供应链核心地位,在供大于求的市场格局下,供应商通常更有动机提供商业信用,达到建立长期合作关系、拓展市场分额的目的。此外,应付账款相较应付票据成本更低、灵活性更高,供应商为维护客户关系会选择更有利于客户的商业信用供给方式。进一步研究发现,一是信用评级水平和市场地位越低,所在城市社会信用环境和市场化发展越好,企业在信用评级下调时越倾向增加商业信用融资。二是企业增加应付账款仅是短期纾困举措,而非对上游资金的长期挤占,评级下调企业在评级上调后会减少上游商业信用融资。三是在信用评级下调时,企业增加应付账款一方面优化了货物流转效率,保障了产销环节连续性,提高了供应链产品流动效率; 另一方面减少了资金流出,将资金配置于边际收益更高的领域,提高了供应链资金流动效率。本文为理解正式融资与非正式融资的互动关系、提升企业供应链效率与韧性提供了参考。

     

    Abstract: Credit rating downgrades may exacerbate corporate credit financing constraints, making it worthwhile to investigate how firms utilize trade credit to cope with liquidity shocks and ensure stable supply chain operations. Using Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies with entity credit ratings as our sample, this study finds that firms experiencing credit rating downgrades tend to obtain upstream trade credit financing in the form of accounts payable, and this finding remains robust after addressing concerns of reverse causality, omitted variables, and sample selection bias. Our analysis indicates that firms with credit ratings typically occupy core positions within supply chains. In a market characterized by excess supply over demand, suppliers are generally more motivated to extend trade credit as a means of establishing long-term cooperative relationships and expanding market share. Furthermore, compared with notes payable, accounts payable feature lower costs and greater flexibility, and suppliers tend to choose trade credit provision methods more favorable to clients to maintain customer relationships. Extended analyses reveal the following: First, enterprises with lower credit rating levels and weaker market positions, as well as those located in cities with better social credit environments and higher degrees of marketization, are more inclined to increase trade credit financing upon credit rating downgrades. Second, the increase in accounts payable represents merely a short-term relief measure rather than long-term appropriation of upstream funds; enterprises experiencing rating downgrades subsequently reduce upstream trade credit financing after rating upgrades. Third, upon credit rating downgrades, the increase in accounts payable, on the one hand, optimizes inventory turnover efficiency, ensures continuity in production and sales processes, and enhances product flow efficiency within supply chains; on the other hand, it reduces capital outflows, allocates funds to areas with higher marginal returns, and improves capital flow efficiency within supply chains. This study provides insights for understanding the interactive relationship between formal and informal financing, and offers implications for enhancing corporate supply chain efficiency and resilience.

     

/

返回文章
返回