王鹏, 陈琪, 梁鑫垚. 考虑协偏度的基金业绩评价研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (1): 56-69.
引用本文: 王鹏, 陈琪, 梁鑫垚. 考虑协偏度的基金业绩评价研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (1): 56-69.
Wang Peng, Chen Qi, Liang Xinyao. Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation with Coskewness[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (1): 56-69.
Citation: Wang Peng, Chen Qi, Liang Xinyao. Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation with Coskewness[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (1): 56-69.

考虑协偏度的基金业绩评价研究

Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation with Coskewness

  • 摘要: 协偏度度量一项资产对市场尾部风险的贡献,是一种重要的系统性风险,亦是资产定价中的重要变量之一。在基金管理中,基金经理可通过投资负协偏度资产来承担协偏度风险,进而获取协偏度风险溢价。为此,在评价基金业绩时有必要将协偏度风险溢价从基金Alpha收益中区分出来,以免误判基金经理获得超额收益的能力。本文构建能捕捉未来协偏度风险的前瞻协偏度因子,将其引入传统多因子模型,并基于2004—2023年我国开放式权益型基金样本,检验协偏度对基金业绩的影响。结果表明:(1)前瞻协偏度因子对基金收益具有显著的解释力,以Fama-French五因子模型为例,协偏度因子对基金收益的解释力仅次于市场因子和价值因子。(2)价值型基金规避了协偏度风险,在考虑协偏度因素后获得业绩奖励,基金业绩明显改善;中小盘基金承担了更多协偏度风险,在考虑协偏度因素后获得业绩惩罚,基金业绩显著下降。(3)基金的协偏度策略具有持续性,前期承担较大协偏度风险的基金,在后期仍然会承担较高的协偏度风险。(4)协偏度风险较高的基金往往更年轻、管理费率更高、持有的资产更缺乏流动性、机构投资者的持有比例更低。本文拓展了基金业绩评价的相关研究,为基金公司构建更科学的评价体系、投资者做出合理投资决策提供了参考。

     

    Abstract: Coskewness measures an asset's contribution to market tail risk, representing an important systematic risk and a crucial variable in asset pricing. In fund management, fund managers can bear the coskewness risk by investing in negative coskewness assets, and then obtain a coskewness risk premium. To this end, it is necessary to distinguish the covariance risk premium from the fund's Alpha returns when evaluating fund performance to avoid misjudging the fund manager's ability to obtain excess returns. This paper constructs a forward-looking coskewness factor that captures future coskewness risk, introduces it into traditional multi-factor models, and examines the impact of coskewness on fund performance based on a sample of Chinese open-end equity funds from 2004 to 2023. The results show that: (1) The forward-looking coskewness factor has significant explanatory power for fund returns. Taking the Fama-French five-factor model as an example, the coskewness factor's explanatory power for fund returns ranks only after the market factor and value factor. (2) Value funds avoid coskewness risk and receive performance rewards after considering coskewness factors, with significantly improved fund performance; small- and mid-cap funds bear more coskewness risk and receive performance penalties after considering coskewness factors, with significantly deteriorated fund performance. (3) Funds' coskewness strategies exhibit persistence, with funds that previously bore greater coskewness risk continuing to bear greater coskewness risk in subsequent periods. (4) Funds with higher coskewness risk tend to be younger, charge higher management fees, hold less liquid assets, and have lower institutional investor ownership ratios. This paper extends research on fund performance evaluation and provides reference for fund companies to construct more scientific evaluation systems and for investors to make rational investment decisions.

     

/

返回文章
返回