蒋学跃. 我国上市公司并购重组财务造假行政法律责任的重构[J]. 证券市场导报, 2025, (10): 55-65.
引用本文: 蒋学跃. 我国上市公司并购重组财务造假行政法律责任的重构[J]. 证券市场导报, 2025, (10): 55-65.
Jiang Xueyue. Reconstruction of Administrative Legal Liability for Financial Fraud in Mergers and Acquisitions of Listed Companies in China[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2025, (10): 55-65.
Citation: Jiang Xueyue. Reconstruction of Administrative Legal Liability for Financial Fraud in Mergers and Acquisitions of Listed Companies in China[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2025, (10): 55-65.

我国上市公司并购重组财务造假行政法律责任的重构

Reconstruction of Administrative Legal Liability for Financial Fraud in Mergers and Acquisitions of Listed Companies in China

  • 摘要: 我国现行证券法在上市公司并购重组领域使用了持续性信息披露逻辑,将上市公司作为并购重组信息披露的首要责任主体,这可能影响财务造假的法律责任配置判断。从域外经验来看,美国证券法突破形式逻辑限制,将并购重组中的信息披露义务从上市公司转移到标的公司实控人,使其承担严苛的法律责任。建议我国证券法突破形式逻辑的限制,明确上市公司发行股份购买资产的信息披露义务人是标的公司实控人,将其纳入发行人监管,并依据欺诈发行追究其责任;对于上市公司及其董事和高管,赋予持续性信息披露义务,仅在其未勤勉尽责范围内发现标的公司财务造假或者知悉造假未及时采取有效补救措施时,才承担相应的法律责任。

     

    Abstract: China's current Securities Law adopts a continuous information disclosure logic in the field of mergers and acquisitions of listed companies, designating listed companies as the primary responsible entities for M&A information disclosure, which may affect the legal liability allocation judgments regarding financial fraud. From overseas experience, U.S. securities law breaks through formal logical limitations by transferring the information disclosure obligations in mergers and acquisitions from listed companies to the actual controllers of target companies, making them bear strict legal liability. This paper recommends that China's Securities Law should similarly overcome formal logical constraints by explicitly designating the actual controllers of the target company as the obligated party for information disclosure when the listed company issues shares to acquire assets. These controllers should be incorporated into the regulatory framework for issuers and held accountable under fraudulent issuance provisions. As for the listed company and its directors and senior executives, they should be assigned continuous information disclosure obligations, bearing legal liability only when they fail to exercise due diligence in detecting financial fraud by target companies or when they neglect to promptly implement effective remedial measures after becoming aware of such fraud.

     

/

返回文章
返回