兴业证券-复旦大学课题组. A股上市公司回购政策效果评估研究J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (10): 15-27.
引用本文: 兴业证券-复旦大学课题组. A股上市公司回购政策效果评估研究J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (10): 15-27.
Research Team of Industrial Securities-Fudan University. A Study on the Evaluation of Share Repurchase Policy Effects of A-Share Listed CompaniesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (10): 15-27.
Citation: Research Team of Industrial Securities-Fudan University. A Study on the Evaluation of Share Repurchase Policy Effects of A-Share Listed CompaniesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (10): 15-27.

A股上市公司回购政策效果评估研究

A Study on the Evaluation of Share Repurchase Policy Effects of A-Share Listed Companies

  • 摘要: 随着我国股票回购制度不断完善,A股回购活跃度持续提升。本文梳理A股回购总体特征,以宣布回购预案的上市公司为样本,运用事件研究法分析回购预案引发的市场反应,并进一步采用双重差分法评估回购支持政策对上市公司回购行为的激励效果。研究发现:第一,A股回购的行业分布日趋多元,2023—2025年间,医药生物、电子等新兴产业成为回购主力;2018年以来,民营企业回购金额占比年均达六成。第二,回购预案整体引发了显著的正向市场反应,且低估值公司、小市值公司以及以市值管理为目的的回购,其正向市场反应更强,这与公司的价值修复空间较大、信息不对称程度较高以及价值维护信号更明确有关。第三,2022年回购规则有效提升了上市公司在市值低估或股价超跌情形下的回购意愿。在市值低估情形下,政策对小市值公司的激励作用更强,不同杠杆水平公司之间的差异不显著,这是因为小市值公司通常信息不对称程度较高,通过回购传递价值信号的需求较强。在股价超跌情形下,政策对大市值公司或高杠杆公司的激励作用更强,这是因为此类公司在股价大幅下跌时稳定市场预期或改善融资条件的需求较强。基于上述发现,本文从实施差异化激励、提升投资者回报、强化信息披露、完善回购融资支持和培育成熟回购文化等方面提出政策建议。

     

    Abstract: As China's share repurchase regime continues to improve, the activity level of share repurchases in the A-share market has steadily increased. This paper reviews the overall characteristics of A-share repurchases, uses a sample of listed companies that announced repurchase plans, applies the event study method to analyze the market reactions triggered by repurchase announcements, and further employs the difference-in-differences method to evaluate the incentive effects of repurchase support policies on listed companies' repurchase behavior. The findings are as follows. First, the industry distribution of A-share repurchases has become increasingly diversified; from 2023 to 2025, emerging industries such as pharmaceuticals and biotechnology and electronics became the main forces of repurchases, and since 2018, private enterprises have accounted for an average of 60% of annual repurchase amounts. Second, repurchase announcements overall triggered significant positive market reactions, and these positive reactions were stronger for low-valuation companies, small-cap companies, and repurchases aimed at market value management, which is associated with such companies' greater scope for value recovery, higher degree of information asymmetry, and clearer value-maintenance signals. Third, the 2022 repurchase rules effectively enhanced listed companies' willingness to repurchase under conditions of market capitalization undervaluation or excessive share price declines. Under conditions of market capitalization undervaluation, the policy exerted a stronger incentive effect on small-cap companies, with no significant differences among companies of varying leverage levels, because small-cap companies typically face a higher degree of information asymmetry and thus have a stronger need to convey value signals through repurchases. Under conditions of excessive share price declines, the policy exerted a stronger incentive effect on large-cap or highly leveraged companies, because such companies have a stronger need to stabilize market expectations or improve financing conditions when share prices fall sharply. Based on the above findings, this paper proposes policy recommendations in terms of implementing differentiated incentives, enhancing investor returns, strengthening information disclosure, improving repurchase financing support and cultivating a mature repurchase culture.

     

/

返回文章
返回