王尹渚, 张潇, 李孝萌, 白晨江. 流动性服务机制如何降低ETF折溢价率波动J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (5): 47-57, 69.
引用本文: 王尹渚, 张潇, 李孝萌, 白晨江. 流动性服务机制如何降低ETF折溢价率波动J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (5): 47-57, 69.
Wang Yinzhu, Zhang Xiao, Li Xiaomeng, Bai Chenjiang. How Liquidity Service Mechanisms Reduce ETF Premium-Discount Rate VolatilityJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (5): 47-57, 69.
Citation: Wang Yinzhu, Zhang Xiao, Li Xiaomeng, Bai Chenjiang. How Liquidity Service Mechanisms Reduce ETF Premium-Discount Rate VolatilityJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (5): 47-57, 69.

流动性服务机制如何降低ETF折溢价率波动

How Liquidity Service Mechanisms Reduce ETF Premium-Discount Rate Volatility

  • 摘要: 在我国ETF市场快速发展的背景下,厘清流动性服务机制如何优化流动性供给结构、促进ETF价格偏离及时修复,具有重要现实意义。本文以沪深交易所分批推进流动性服务机制为准自然实验,利用股票型ETF月度数据,构建堆叠式双重差分模型系统评估其政策效应。研究发现,ETF纳入流动性服务机制后,折溢价率波动显著下降,该效应通过了多重稳健性检验。作用机制一是通过持续双边报价降低交易摩擦,提高套利交易的可执行性,促进价格偏离更快修复;二是通过规定最低报价数量,提高市场对大额订单的承接与缓冲能力,降低大额订单的边际价格冲击;三是通过稳定的订单簿供给,使价格中的临时性噪声和非基本面冲击更快被市场吸收,价格对净值信息的反映更加及时,折溢价率在更短时间内向均衡水平回归。异质性分析表明,在市场低收益时期、标的指数波动较大时期,以及规模较小、初始流动性较差的ETF,该政策效应更加显著。本文为完善流动性服务资源配置提供了经验证据,对健全资本市场基础制度、推动ETF市场高质量发展具有启示意义。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of rapid expansion in China's ETF market, elucidating how liquidity service mechanisms optimize liquidity supply structure and facilitate timely correction of ETF price deviations holds significant practical implications. This study employs the phased implementation of liquidity service mechanisms by Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges as a quasi-natural experiment, utilizing monthly data from equity ETFs and constructing a stacked difference-in-differences model to systematically evaluate policy effects. The findings reveal that following ETF inclusion in liquidity service mechanisms, premium-discount rate volatility significantly decreases, an effect that withstands multiple robustness tests. The mechanisms operate through three channels: first, continuous bilateral quotations reduce trading frictions, thereby enhancing arbitrage transaction executability and accelerating price deviation correction; second, by stipulating minimum quotation quantities, the mechanism improves market capacity to absorb and buffer large orders, reducing the marginal price impact of substantial transactions; third, through stable order book supply, temporary noise and non-fundamental shocks in prices are absorbed more rapidly by the market, price reflection of net asset value information becomes more timely, and premium-discount rates revert to equilibrium levels within shorter timeframes. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that policy effects are more pronounced during periods of low market returns, periods of elevated benchmark index volatility, and for ETFs with smaller scale and initially poorer liquidity. This study provides empirical evidence for improving liquidity service resource allocation and offers insights for strengthening capital market foundational institutions and promoting high-quality development of the ETF market.

     

/

返回文章
返回