王守海, 孟永涛, 郭英栋, 潘立才. 股东关系网络如何赋能企业双化协同?[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (2): 29-42.
引用本文: 王守海, 孟永涛, 郭英栋, 潘立才. 股东关系网络如何赋能企业双化协同?[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (2): 29-42.
Wang Shouhai, Meng Yongtao, Guo Yingdong, Pan Licai. How Do Shareholder Relationship Networks Enable Enterprise Dual Transformation Synergy?[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (2): 29-42.
Citation: Wang Shouhai, Meng Yongtao, Guo Yingdong, Pan Licai. How Do Shareholder Relationship Networks Enable Enterprise Dual Transformation Synergy?[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (2): 29-42.

股东关系网络如何赋能企业双化协同?

How Do Shareholder Relationship Networks Enable Enterprise Dual Transformation Synergy?

  • 摘要: 数字化绿色化协同转型(简称双化协同)是企业应对气候变化、提升生产经营效率的重要举措,但在实践中存在资金有限、人才供给不足、技术基础薄弱以及投资者顾虑较多等困难。本文以股东关系网络,即企业间因存在相同股东而建立的社会关系网络为视角,以沪深A股上市公司为样本,研究发现当企业处于股东关系网络较核心位置时,股东关系网络能显著促进双化协同,进而提升企业价值。股东关系网络一是为企业拓宽内外部融资渠道,缓解企业融资约束,避免数字化投资与绿色化改造间的资金挤出; 二是为企业提供人才培养和管理信息,帮助企业建立高质量的复合型人才供给体系,促进企业人力资本结构升级; 三是通过建立共享研发平台、促成战略技术合作等方式,帮助企业获取、整合前沿创新知识,提升企业创新能力; 四是提供双化协同政策、进展和成效等信息,降低企业和投资者对双化协同“投入大、收益不明确”的担忧。进一步分析表明,对于内部控制水平较高、地处环境规制强度和市场化程度较高区域的企业,以及属双化协同需求迫切行业(如电力、热力、燃气及水生产和供应业)、劳动密集型行业(如制造业)、重资产行业(如卫生和社会工作)的企业,上述积极效应更加显著。此外,由非金融类股东、非国有股东、跨行业股东形成的股东关系网络,对企业双化协同的推动作用更强。本文为提升新质生产力、促进经济可持续发展提供了实践参考。

     

    Abstract: The synergistic digital-green transformation (hereinafter referred to as "dual transformation synergy") represents a critical initiative for enterprises to address climate change and enhance operational efficiency. However, practical implementation faces challenges including limited capital, insufficient talent supply, weak technological foundations, and substantial investor concerns. From the perspective of shareholder relationship networks—defined as social relationship networks established among enterprises through common shareholders—and based on a sample of A-share listed companies listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, this study finds that when enterprises occupy more central positions within shareholder relationship networks, such networks significantly promote dual transformation synergy, thereby enhancing firm value. Shareholder relationship networks facilitate dual transformation synergy through four mechanisms: first, by broadening internal and external financing channels to alleviate financing constraints, thereby preventing capital crowding-out between digital investment and green transformation; second, by providing talent cultivation and management information to help enterprises establish high-quality composite talent supply systems, promoting the upgrading of human capital structures; third, by enabling enterprises to acquire and integrate cutting-edge innovative knowledge through establishing shared R&D platforms and facilitating strategic technological cooperation, thereby enhancing innovation capabilities; fourth, by disseminating information regarding dual transformation synergy policies, progress, and outcomes, reducing concerns of both enterprises and investors about the "substantial investment with uncertain returns" nature of dual transformation synergy. Further analysis reveals that these positive effects are more pronounced for enterprises with higher internal control quality, those located in regions with stronger environmental regulations and higher marketization levels, and those in industries with urgent dual transformation synergy demands (e.g., electricity, heat, gas and water production and supply), labor-intensive industries (e.g., manufacturing), and asset-heavy industries (e.g., health and social work). Additionally, shareholder relationship networks formed by non-financial shareholders, non-state-owned shareholders, and cross-industry shareholders exert stronger facilitative effects on dual transformation synergy. This study provides practical insights for enhancing new quality productive forces and promoting sustainable economic development.

     

/

返回文章
返回