杨阳, 徐泽林. 指数调整、机构投资者持股与公司信息质量——来自中证800指数和中证1000指数断点回归的证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (8): 70-80.
引用本文: 杨阳, 徐泽林. 指数调整、机构投资者持股与公司信息质量——来自中证800指数和中证1000指数断点回归的证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (8): 70-80.
Yang Yang, Xu Zelin. Index Adjustment, Institutional Ownership, and Corporate Information Quality: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design Based on the CSI 800 and CSI 1000 IndicesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (8): 70-80.
Citation: Yang Yang, Xu Zelin. Index Adjustment, Institutional Ownership, and Corporate Information Quality: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design Based on the CSI 800 and CSI 1000 IndicesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (8): 70-80.

指数调整、机构投资者持股与公司信息质量——来自中证800指数和中证1000指数断点回归的证据

Index Adjustment, Institutional Ownership, and Corporate Information Quality: Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design Based on the CSI 800 and CSI 1000 Indices

  • 摘要: 伴随资本市场改革全面深化,以公募基金为代表的机构投资者在上市公司治理中发挥着日益重要的作用。本文基于中证800指数和中证1000指数成份股定期调整,采用断点回归分析方法,研究发现指数调整改变了股票在指数中的权重,机构投资者偏好信息搜集成本更低的高权重股票,相较于中证800指数末尾成份股,机构投资者对中证1000指数头部成份股的持股比例更高。进一步分析表明,机构投资者持股显著改善了上市公司信息质量,表现为信息披露频率更高、披露内容更丰富、展示形式更直观,以及股价同步性更低、特质波动水平更高、股票流动性更好。作用机制一是通过实地调研和退出威胁,督促上市公司提高了信息质量;二是利用证券分析师的职业关注,间接对上市公司施加监督压力。本文为强化机构投资者信息中介功能、进一步完善资本市场信息治理提供了启示。

     

    Abstract: With the comprehensive deepening of capital market reform, institutional investors represented by public mutual funds are playing an increasingly important role in the governance of listed companies. Based on the periodic adjustments of constituent stocks of the CSI 800 and CSI 1000 indices, this paper employs a regression discontinuity design and finds that index adjustment alters the weights of stocks within an index, and that institutional investors prefer high-weight stocks with lower information collection costs. Compared with the bottom-ranked constituent stocks of the CSI 800 index, institutional investors hold a higher proportion of the top-ranked constituent stocks of the CSI 1000 index. Further analysis shows that institutional ownership significantly improves the information quality of listed companies, manifested as more frequent information disclosure, richer disclosure content, more intuitive presentation formats, as well as lower stock price synchronicity, higher levels of idiosyncratic volatility, and better stock liquidity. The underlying mechanisms are twofold: first, institutional investors urge listed companies to improve information quality through field research and the threat of exit; second, they exert indirect supervisory pressure on listed companies by leveraging the professional attention of securities analysts. This paper offers insights for strengthening the information intermediary function of institutional investors and further improving information governance in capital markets.

     

/

返回文章
返回