周开国, 王宇轩, 马思超. 资质认定与企业供应链配置多元化——来自国家企业技术中心评定的证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (9): 37-46.
引用本文: 周开国, 王宇轩, 马思超. 资质认定与企业供应链配置多元化——来自国家企业技术中心评定的证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (9): 37-46.
Zhou Kaiguo, Wang Yuxuan, Ma Sichao. Qualification Certification and Enterprise Supply Chain Diversification: Evidence from the Accreditation of National Enterprise Technology CentersJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (9): 37-46.
Citation: Zhou Kaiguo, Wang Yuxuan, Ma Sichao. Qualification Certification and Enterprise Supply Chain Diversification: Evidence from the Accreditation of National Enterprise Technology CentersJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (9): 37-46.

资质认定与企业供应链配置多元化——来自国家企业技术中心评定的证据

Qualification Certification and Enterprise Supply Chain Diversification: Evidence from the Accreditation of National Enterprise Technology Centers

  • 摘要: 在复杂多变的社会经济形势下,国家资质认定如何引导资源有效配置、提升供应链安全水平,成为学术界和实务界共同关注的重要议题。本文基于沪深A股上市公司数据,研究发现国家企业技术中心评定有效促进了企业供应链配置的多元化,在经过工具变量法、倾向得分匹配法和安慰剂检验后,该结论依然成立。作用机制一是发挥信号效应,提高企业声誉并增强市场关注,吸引更多上下游市场主体寻求合作;二是发挥资金效应,企业获取充足的资金后,依托商业信用向供应链上下游提供非正式融资支持,强化上下游合作意愿;三是发挥创新效应,促进企业间研发合作,有助于企业产品品类、产量和竞争优势同步攀升,推动扩大原料投入和拓展下游市场空间;四是发挥人才效应,依托系统化的人才引进与培育机制,助力企业汇聚高技术人才,促进企业研发创新。进一步研究发现,评定政策对供应链配置的积极影响对上游环节、高竞争行业和国有企业更显著。此外,国家企业技术中心评定能够通过供应链配置多元化,降低企业经营风险、提升企业经营绩效。本文为充分发挥国家资质评定作用、进一步完善创新支持政策提供了启示。

     

    Abstract: Amid a complex and volatile socioeconomic environment, how national qualification certification can guide the effective allocation of resources and enhance supply chain security has become an important issue of shared concern among academics and practitioners. Using data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies, this study finds that accreditation as a National Enterprise Technology Center effectively promotes the diversification of firms' supply chain configurations. This finding remains robust after applying the instrumental variable approach, propensity score matching, and placebo tests. The underlying mechanisms operate through four channels: (1) a signaling effect, whereby accreditation enhances corporate reputation and increases market attention, attracting more upstream and downstream partners to seek cooperation; (2) a capital effect, whereby accredited firms leverage commercial credit to provide informal financing support to supply chain partners, strengthening their willingness to cooperate; (3) an innovation effect, whereby accreditation fosters inter-firm R & D collaboration, helping firms simultaneously expand product variety, output, and competitive advantage, thereby driving greater raw material procurement and downstream market expansion; and (4) a talent effect, whereby systematic talent recruitment and cultivation mechanisms help firms attract highly skilled personnel and promote R & D innovation. Further analysis shows that the positive impact of accreditation on supply chain configuration is more pronounced for upstream segments, highly competitive industries, and state-owned enterprises. In addition, accreditation can reduce operational risk and improve firm performance through supply chain diversification. This study offers implications for fully leveraging national qualification accreditation and further improving innovation support policies.

     

/

返回文章
返回