张时颖, 田凌宇, 程新生. 重要股东多样性与企业连续性创新——来自中国高科技行业上市公司的经验证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (3): 3-13, 38.
引用本文: 张时颖, 田凌宇, 程新生. 重要股东多样性与企业连续性创新——来自中国高科技行业上市公司的经验证据J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (3): 3-13, 38.
Zhang Shiying, Tian Lingyu, Cheng Xinsheng. Major Shareholder Diversity and Corporate Continuous Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Listed CompaniesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (3): 3-13, 38.
Citation: Zhang Shiying, Tian Lingyu, Cheng Xinsheng. Major Shareholder Diversity and Corporate Continuous Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Listed CompaniesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (3): 3-13, 38.

重要股东多样性与企业连续性创新——来自中国高科技行业上市公司的经验证据

Major Shareholder Diversity and Corporate Continuous Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Listed Companies

  • 摘要: 连续性创新是企业跨越技术周期、实现高质量发展的核心驱动力,重要股东作为企业关键治理主体,会对企业创新领域、投资决策等产生重要影响。本文将重要股东分为产业导向型、技术导向型、财务导向型和其他四种类型,以沪深A股高科技行业上市公司为样本,考察重要股东多样性对企业连续性创新的影响。研究发现,重要股东类型过于分散会抑制企业的连续性创新,其核心原因在于重要股东多元化诉求会导致企业战略焦点分散,影响研发投入强度、降低资源配置效率,进而削弱企业连续性创新。进一步地,异质性分析表明在战略激进度较高的企业和非国有企业中,重要股东多样性的抑制效应更显著。本文揭示了重要股东多样性在影响企业长期技术迭代过程中的治理逻辑,为上市公司优化创新协同治理机制,以及监管部门培育赋能型长线资本,提供证据支持和政策启示。

     

    Abstract: Continuous innovation serves as the core driving force for firms to transcend technology cycles and achieve high-quality development. As key governance entities, major shareholders exert significant influence on firms' innovation domains and investment decisions. This study categorizes major shareholders into four types: industry-oriented, technology-oriented, finance-oriented, and others. Using a sample of high-tech listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets, we examine the impact of major shareholder diversity on corporate continuous innovation. The findings reveal that excessive dispersion of major shareholder types inhibits firms' continuous innovation. The underlying mechanism is that the heterogeneous demands of diverse major shareholders lead to dispersed strategic focus, affect R&D investment intensity and reduce resource allocation efficiency, thereby weakening corporate continuous innovation. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the inhibitory effect of major shareholder diversity is more pronounced in firms with higher strategic aggressiveness and in non-state-owned enterprises. This study unveils the governance logic through which major shareholder diversity influences firms' long-term technological iteration processes, providing empirical evidence and policy implications for listed companies to optimize collaborative innovation governance mechanisms and for regulatory authorities to cultivate enabling long-term capital.

     

/

返回文章
返回