任柳杨, 雷倩华, 刘碧欣. 数字技术为何扩大ESG评级分歧?J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (6): 25-35.
引用本文: 任柳杨, 雷倩华, 刘碧欣. 数字技术为何扩大ESG评级分歧?J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (6): 25-35.
Ren Yangliu, Lei Qianhua, Liu Bixin. Why Does Digital Technology Widen ESG Rating Divergence?J. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (6): 25-35.
Citation: Ren Yangliu, Lei Qianhua, Liu Bixin. Why Does Digital Technology Widen ESG Rating Divergence?J. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (6): 25-35.

数字技术为何扩大ESG评级分歧?

Why Does Digital Technology Widen ESG Rating Divergence?

  • 摘要: 数字技术发展改变了信息生产方式,其对企业是改善信息透明度、提高ESG表现判断一致性,还是提供选择性披露技术工具、扩大ESG评级分歧?本文以沪深A股上市公司为样本,研究发现数字技术显著加剧了企业ESG评级分歧。作用机制一是催生了低成本、广覆盖的线上信息发布渠道,便于企业策略性地披露经过筛选的正面信息和愿景性承诺,隐匿或淡化负面事件、争议性指标和实质性风险;二是增加了ESG信息披露数量,造成“信息噪音”叠加、有效信息被稀释,使得不同评级机构在海量碎片化信息中产生解读偏差与判断差异。异质性分析表明,对于重污染、数字化水平较低、环境关切度较低、分析师关注度较低的企业,数字技术加剧ESG评级分歧的影响更显著。本文为理解数字技术的双重影响提供了来自ESG评级分歧的经验证据,并为以数字技术推动高质量发展、完善企业环境信息披露机制提供了参考。

     

    Abstract: The development of digital technology has transformed the way information is produced. Does it improve information transparency and enhance the consistency of judgments regarding corporate ESG performance, or does it provide technical tools for selective disclosure that widen ESG rating divergence? Using a sample of A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, this study finds that digital technology significantly intensifies ESG rating divergence among firms. The first underlying mechanism is that digital technology has given rise to low-cost, broad-coverage online information release channels, enabling firms to strategically disclose curated positive information and aspirational commitments while concealing or downplaying negative events, controversial indicators, and material risks. The second mechanism is that digital technology increases the volume of ESG information disclosure, leading to compounded "information noise" and the dilution of valid information, which causes different rating agencies to develop interpretive biases and divergent judgments amid vast quantities of fragmented information. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the effect of digital technology in intensifying ESG rating divergence is more pronounced for firms that are heavily polluting, have lower levels of digitalization, exhibit lower environmental concern, and receive less analyst attention. This paper provides empirical evidence—drawn from ESG rating divergence—for understanding the dual effects of digital technology, and offers a reference for leveraging digital technology to promote high-quality development and for improving corporate environmental information disclosure mechanisms.

     

/

返回文章
返回