吴甜甜, 周雨田. 极端事件冲击下全球股市波动溢出效应研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (2): 68-80.
引用本文: 吴甜甜, 周雨田. 极端事件冲击下全球股市波动溢出效应研究[J]. 证券市场导报, 2026, (2): 68-80.
Wu Tiantian, Zhou Yutian. Volatility Spillover Effects in Global Stock Markets under Extreme Event Shocks[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (2): 68-80.
Citation: Wu Tiantian, Zhou Yutian. Volatility Spillover Effects in Global Stock Markets under Extreme Event Shocks[J]. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (2): 68-80.

极端事件冲击下全球股市波动溢出效应研究

Volatility Spillover Effects in Global Stock Markets under Extreme Event Shocks

  • 摘要: 波动溢出本质反映市场间的跨期相依性,但传统模型在测算时通常包含同期相依性,进而高估了市场波动溢出强度。本文创新性构建双因子TVP-VAR-DY模型,有效剥离全球经济增长等系统性影响因素以及区域政策联动等局部共振,计算全球10个重要股市在7个极端事件冲击下的波动溢出。研究发现:(1)总体来看,美国、德国和中国香港的净波动溢出指数较高,是全球股市网络中主要的风险输出者。(2)次贷危机、欧债危机等经济金融事件具有较强的即时传染性和传染持续性,会通过恐慌情绪和资本重置渠道引发全球市场同频共振。(3)英国脱欧、俄乌冲突、中美贸易摩擦等区域性冲突或地缘政治事件,会在受影响程度较深的区域形成集中的风险敞口,并通过政策预期外溢和市场信心受挫引发全球市场剧烈波动。(4)日本大地震等自然灾害与公共卫生事件在初始阶段影响范围有限,但随着负面效应(如核泄漏)扩散,冲击将从局部问题升级为系统性风险,并通过供应链紧张、产业链中断等渠道影响全球市场。本文为风险溢出领域研究提供了更可靠的测度方法,也为我国精准监测风险源头、更好应对外部金融市场冲击提供了参考。

     

    Abstract: Volatility spillovers inherently reflect inter-temporal dependence across markets; however, traditional models typically incorporate contemporaneous dependence in their measurements, thereby overestimating the intensity of market volatility spillovers. This paper innovatively constructs a two-factor TVP-VAR-DY model that effectively disentangles systematic factors such as global economic growth and local resonance such as regional policy coordination, to calculate volatility spillovers across ten major global stock markets under seven extreme event shocks. The findings reveal that: (1) Overall, the United States, Germany, and Hong Kong exhibit relatively higher net volatility spillover indices, serving as primary risk transmitters in the global stock market network. (2) Economic and financial events such as the subprime mortgage crisis and the European sovereign debt crisis demonstrate strong immediate and persistent contagion effects, triggering synchronized global market co-movements through panic sentiment and capital reallocation channels. (3) Regional conflicts or geopolitical events, including Brexit, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and China-US trade frictions, create concentrated risk exposures in deeply affected regions and induce severe global market volatility through policy expectation spillovers and deteriorating market confidence. (4) Natural disasters and public health emergencies, such as the Great East Japan Earthquake, initially exhibit limited impact scope; however, as negative effects (e.g., nuclear leakage) spread, shocks escalate from localized problems to systemic risks, affecting global markets through supply chain disruptions and industrial chain interruptions. This paper provides a more reliable measurement methodology for volatility spillover research and offers insights for China to precisely monitor risk sources and better respond to external financial market shocks.

     

/

返回文章
返回