丁皓, 刘春林. 从企业异常审计费用看国际化扩张的利弊J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (7): 72-80.
引用本文: 丁皓, 刘春林. 从企业异常审计费用看国际化扩张的利弊J. 证券市场导报, 2026, (7): 72-80.
Ding Hao, Liu Chunlin. The Pros and Cons of International Expansion: A Perspective from Abnormal Audit FeesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (7): 72-80.
Citation: Ding Hao, Liu Chunlin. The Pros and Cons of International Expansion: A Perspective from Abnormal Audit FeesJ. Securities Market Herald, 2026, (7): 72-80.

从企业异常审计费用看国际化扩张的利弊

The Pros and Cons of International Expansion: A Perspective from Abnormal Audit Fees

  • 摘要: 国际化扩张有助于企业突破国内市场瓶颈、提升核心竞争优势,但也可能加剧企业经营环境复杂性,导致管理成本上升,甚至影响企业内部治理。本文以沪深A股上市公司为样本,研究发现国际化扩张对企业经营绩效有显著正向影响,表现为净资产收益率和营业收入增长率双提升,但国际化扩张也增加了企业异常审计费用。作用机制在于,一方面经营地理范围扩大和业务结构多元化共同推升了企业业务复杂性,另一方面企业信息不对称程度加剧为管理层从事非生产性的寻租活动创造了条件,后者效应更加显著,需引起关注。此外,国际化扩张导致的异常审计费用增加,往往伴随着审计质量下降和经营绩效受损。建议一是将异常审计费用纳入审计质量检查指标体系,对审计费用连续三年显著偏离行业正常水平的企业列为重点监管对象,定期发布异常审计费用行业分析报告,引导市场形成对异常审计费用的监督氛围;二是引导国际化企业在内部控制流程中增设审计费用的监控指标,建立异常审计费用的内部追溯机制,从源头上遏制审计合谋;三是鼓励分析师对审计费用异常的企业进行持续跟踪和风险揭示,形成对异常审计费用的市场化约束。本研究为异常审计费用的前因研究提供了新的视角,也为国际化进程中的审计治理提供了实践参考。

     

    Abstract: International expansion helps firms overcome domestic bottlenecks and enhance competitiveness, yet it may also heighten the complexity of the operating environment, drive up management costs, and even impair internal corporate governance. Using a sample of A-share firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, this paper finds that international expansion has a significantly positive effect on firms' operating performance, raising both return on equity and revenue growth, yet it also increases firms' abnormal audit fees. Two mechanisms are at work: on the one hand, the wider geographic scope of operations and the greater diversification of business structure jointly raise business complexity; on the other hand, the intensified information asymmetry within firms creates conditions for managers to engage in unproductive rent-seeking. The latter effect is more pronounced and warrants attention. In addition, the increase in abnormal audit fees induced by international expansion is often accompanied by a decline in audit quality and operating performance. The study recommends: first, abnormal audit fees should be incorporated into the audit quality inspection indicator system. Firms whose audit fees deviate significantly from the industry norm for three consecutive years should be designated as key regulatory targets, and industry analysis reports on abnormal audit fees should be regularly published to foster a market-wide monitoring atmosphere. Second, multinational enterprises should be guided to add monitoring indicators for audit fees in their internal control processes and establish internal tracing mechanisms for abnormal audit fees, thereby curbing audit collusion at its source. Third, analysts should be encouraged to continuously track and disclose risks of firms with abnormal audit fees, thereby forming market-based constraints on abnormal audit fees. This study offers a new perspective on the causes of abnormal audit fees and provides practical guidance for audit governance in internationalization.

     

/

返回文章
返回