楼秋然. 应对气候变化的公司法:理性反思与制度建构J. 证券市场导报, 2025, (6): 57-65.
引用本文: 楼秋然. 应对气候变化的公司法:理性反思与制度建构J. 证券市场导报, 2025, (6): 57-65.
Lou Qiuran. Corporate Law in Response to Climate Change: Theoretical Review and Institutional ConstructionJ. Securities Market Herald, 2025, (6): 57-65.
Citation: Lou Qiuran. Corporate Law in Response to Climate Change: Theoretical Review and Institutional ConstructionJ. Securities Market Herald, 2025, (6): 57-65.

应对气候变化的公司法:理性反思与制度建构

Corporate Law in Response to Climate Change: Theoretical Review and Institutional Construction

  • 摘要: 应对气候变化需要全人类同心协力,其中,部门法应发挥好体系性联动与协调作用。由于公司法本身需要贯彻生态环境保护的价值目标,而气候变化是ESG中的突出问题,叠加环境法单兵突进无法妥善解决,作为规制主要经济细胞之公司的公司法理应认真对待气候变化问题。然而,现阶段无论是已有的、可能用于应对气候变化的公司法规则,还是初步建构的气候变化信息披露法律体系都存在不足。我国公司法未来有必要通过法律解释或者再修订的方式,通过确立商业判断规则和提供多元化组织形态供给的赋权路径、要求机构投资者尽责管理和发挥股东提案权制度功能的对话路径、确立董事对气候变化问题的知情义务和对第191条进行目的性限缩解释的追责路径,实现对气候变化问题的积极应对。

     

    Abstract: To address the challenge of climate change requires the concerted efforts of all humanity. Particularly, departmental laws should play a systematic role in coordination and linkage. Since corporate law itself should uphold the value goal of ecological and environmental protection and climate change is a prominent issue within ESG, coupled with the fact that environmental law alone is insufficient to properly resolve the problem, corporate law which regulates the primary economic entities should take climate change problems seriously. However, at present, both the existing and potential corporate law rules for addressing climate change, as well as the nascent legal framework for climate-related information disclosure, have shortcomings. In the future, China's corporate law is necessary to actively respond to climate change by means of legal interpretation or legislative revision. Specifically, an active response to climate change issues may include the following aspects. First, it should establish business judgment rules and provide diversified organizational forms as empowerment paths. Second, it should require institutional investors to exercise responsible management and leverage the shareholder proposal mechanism as a dialogue path. Third, it should impose a duty of care on directors regarding climate change issues and adopt a purposive restrictive interpretation of Article 191 as an accountability path.

     

/

返回文章
返回