张壹帆, 陆岷峰. 新质生产力视角下政府引导基金“耐心度”培育:评价体系与利益平衡J. 证券市场导报, 2025, (1): 53-64.
引用本文: 张壹帆, 陆岷峰. 新质生产力视角下政府引导基金“耐心度”培育:评价体系与利益平衡J. 证券市场导报, 2025, (1): 53-64.
Zhang Yifan, Lu Minfeng. Cultivating "Patience" in Government Guidance Funds from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces: Evaluation System and Balance of InterestsJ. Securities Market Herald, 2025, (1): 53-64.
Citation: Zhang Yifan, Lu Minfeng. Cultivating "Patience" in Government Guidance Funds from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces: Evaluation System and Balance of InterestsJ. Securities Market Herald, 2025, (1): 53-64.

新质生产力视角下政府引导基金“耐心度”培育:评价体系与利益平衡

Cultivating "Patience" in Government Guidance Funds from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces: Evaluation System and Balance of Interests

  • 摘要: 培育和发展新质生产力需要壮大耐心资本规模,从理论范畴与现实表现看,私募股权基金相对符合耐心资本标准。然而,当前政府母子基金间机制待完善。若要激励私募股权子基金成长为尊重创新周期的耐心资本,政府引导基金必须提高“耐心度”,建构对子基金的容错免责与绩效激励机制。基于此,本文运用目标导向理论,设计“耐心度”评价体系调查问卷,根据线下、线上大样本调查数据,构建政府引导基金“耐心度”评价体系,对1000家地方政府引导基金打分排名,并检验政府引导基金“耐心度”与区域子基金数量、投早中期项目数量以及科创板上市公司数量之间的关系。研究结果表明,充足的财政收入支撑了政府引导基金的出资量与“耐心度”,提升了区域股权融资量与科创质量,而更多的优质高新技术企业又进一步激励政府引导基金提高出资量与“耐心度”,以此形成正向循环。此外,本文从合伙关系与合规体系的法治角度,推演了管理人尽职合规责任豁免原则,并建议政府引导基金将“耐心度”作为绩效衡量指标,平等对待不同资金来源的私募子基金,助力子基金、科创企业高质量发展。

     

    Abstract: Cultivating and developing new quality productive forces requires expanding the scale of patient capital. From both theoretical and practical perspectives, private equity funds relatively align with the standards of patient capital. However, the current mechanism between government parent funds and sub-funds needs to be improved. To encourage sub-funds to grow into patient capital that accords with the innovation cycle, government guidance funds must enhance their "patience, " establishing mechanisms for fault-tolerant liability exemption and performance incentives for sub-funds. Based on this, the paper adopts a goal-oriented theory to design a "patience" evaluation system survey questionnaire. Based on large-scale offline and online survey data, the study constructs a "patience" evaluation system for government guidance funds, scoring and ranking 1000 local government guidance funds. It also examines the relationships between the "patience" of government guidance funds and the number of regional sub-funds, the number of early- and mid-stage investment projects, and the number of companies listed on the STAR Market. The findings reveal that sufficient fiscal revenue supports the funding scale and "patience" of government guidance funds, boosting the amount of regional equity financing and the quality of science and technology innovation. Moreover, the presence of more high-quality and high-tech enterprises further incentivizes government guidance funds to increase their funding scale and "patience, " leading to a positive feedback loop. In addition, this article deduces the principle of liability exemption for managers' due diligence and compliance from the legal perspective of partnership relationships and compliance systems. It recommends that government guidance funds adopt "patience" as a performance evaluation metric and treat sub-funds funded by different sources equitably, promoting the high-quality development of sub-funds and science and technology innovation enterprises.

     

/

返回文章
返回